Reframing culture: Stuart Cunningham’s legacies

Silhoute of person on bycylce riding through a city street

Reframing culture: Stuart Cunningham’s legacies

Author Kathy Nickels
Date 22 December 2021

In a recent essay published in Media International Australia, Professor Julian Thomas reflects on the substantial and diverse contributions of ADM+S Board member, Distinguished Professor Stuart Cunningham to ‘reframing culture’ in Australian research, policy and industry practice from early reformulations of Australian film history to his recent work on digital media disruption.

“One of Cunningham’s distinctive qualities was his interest in not only studying institutions and policies, but also in working with others to make them and shape them” writes Professor Thomas.

The essay discusses the range of Cunningham’s institutional and intellectual legacies, suggesting that his advocacy for cultural policy and the creative industries together with his leadership of major collaborative research initiatives in the humanities and social sciences have been especially important for media and cultural studies in Australia.

Further, his approach to the project of ‘reframing culture’ is likely to remain a critical task.

Read the full essay Reframing culture: Stuart Cunningham’s legacies

SEE ALSO

ADM+S and Australian Red Cross Partnership – Technology for Society Series

Male teacher with group of students using laptop

ADM+S and Australian Red Cross Partnership – Technology for Society Series

Author Leah Hawkins & Loren Dela Cruz
Date 20 December 2021

The ARC Centre for Excellence for Automated Decision-Making and Society (ADM+S) and Humanitech, an initiative of the Australian Red Cross dedicated to harnessing emerging technologies for the benefit of humanity, have launched the Technology for Society online series which presents the best minds on the forefront of technological and social innovation. The series highlights the critical issues at the intersection of humanity and evolving technologies with discussions between academia, industry, and humanitarian organisations.

The series launched on 30 November 2021 with a conversation between Distinguished Professor Julian Thomas (ADM+S Centre Director), Amanda Robinson (Co-Founder and Director of Humanitech), and Ivana Jurko (Co-founder and Evidence and Influence Lead at Humanitech, and Partner Investigator at the ADM+S Centre) exploring the creation of the ADM+S Centre/Humanitech partnership, the initiatives the partnership has enabled and the value of strong cross-sector relationships.

The strategic partnership between ADM+S and Humanitech was cultivated in 2018 to inform research and ensure ethical and streamlined industry processes. It is a commitment to improving collective understanding between civil society and research organisations of the potential benefits and risks of emerging technologies and aims to inform public debate and create resources for those tackling the problems created by automated decision-making.

Prof Thomas reflected on the practical benefits to researchers, who “often get our best ideas from talking to people in organisations like the Red Cross and Humanitech… there is an understanding of the contingencies, the problems, the challenges that arise on the ground and that inspires [researchers] to reframe our questions, to go back to the problems and to rethink our research programs. It’s that sort of complex collaboration that we enjoy with Humanitech and the Red Cross.”

“Already we have had a huge amount of interaction, from projects related to humanitarian data mapping, to looking at the spread of misinformation through digital media, to research roundtables on child protection… Over time [we will be] looking at more strategic ways of bringing that incredible array of new evidence and insight back into Red Cross,” said Jurko.

Robinson attributes the success of the partnership to “relationships…built on trust, on transparency, on vulnerability… building that trust is how we enable fantastic outcomes.”

SEE ALSO

Directors’ End of Year Message 2021

Friends toasting drinks during social gathering

Directors’ End of Year Message 2021

Author Distinguished Professor Julian Thomas & Professor Jean Burgess 
Date 17 December 2021

Among all the difficulties created by the pandemic, the ADM+S Centre has achieved a great deal. After our first full year of activity, we now have over 175 members working on 40 research projects with 33 partner organisations. 57 research students are now working in the Centre.

Our extraordinary progress is the result of the dedication and creativity of our researchers, our professional staff, and our close collaborations with our partners and colleagues.

We want to thank everyone for your contributions to the Centre’s achievements this year and look forward to seeing you in 2022!

Best wishes for the summer break,
Distinguished Professor Julian Thomas, Centre Director
&
Professor Jean Burgess, Associate Director

SEE ALSO

Australian Research Council officially launches the ARC Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making & Society

RMIT University Interim Vice-Chancellor Dionne Higgins marks the launch of the Centre with ribbon cutting

Australian Research Council officially launches the ARC Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making & Society

Author Loren Dela Cruz 
Date 10 December 2021

The Australian Research Council officially announced the launch of the ARC Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making & Society (ADM+S) at a reception held on Tuesday 7 December 2021.

Supported by grants of up to $71 million over 7 years, the new, cross-disciplinary, national research centre, aims to create the knowledge and strategies necessary for responsible, ethical, and inclusive automated decision-making. The Centre, which is led by Distinguished Professor Julian Thomas and Professor Jean Burgess, is based at RMIT University in Melbourne with nodes located at 8 other Australian universities, and partnerships with organisations around the world.

Australian Research Council Chief Executive Officer Professor Sue Thomas commended the Centre for “assembling a strong and diverse team from across social and technological disciplines” to investigate the advances and applications of automated decision-making in Australia.

True to the collaborative ethos of the Centre, the launch event was held in-person in Melbourne with satellite events in Sydney and Brisbane, and live-streamed online.

Melbourne Launch Event
Melbourne Launch at RMIT University

 

Sydney Launch Event at The University of Sydney
Sydney Launch at The University of Sydney

 

Brisbane Launch at QUT
Brisbane Launch at QUT

 

“The Centre brings together an exceptional team of established and emerging researchers. We are delighted to be now well underway, with the strong support of the ARC and all our partner organisations,” said Prof Thomas.

The event closed with a short video highlighting the achievements of the ADM+S Centre since commencement in August 2020 and featured researchers from various research programs and focus areas. Watch it here.

SEE ALSO

Citizen scientists to drive independent assessment of search engines and social media advertising

Person searching laptop with labrador by their side

Citizen scientists to drive independent assessment of search engines and social media advertising

Author Kathy Nickels
Date 17 December 2021

Researchers at the ARC Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making and Society (ADM+S) are using citizen scientists to understand the impact of online search recommendations and advertising practices on Australian internet users.

The Australian Search Experience and The Australian Ad Observatory projects, launched earlier this year, are generating datasets that represent the online experiences of varied demographic groups in Australia.

Professor Julian Thomas, Director of the ADM+S Centre, said the projects are critical to enabling greater understanding of the operations of search engines and social media advertising platforms.

‘Australians use search engines and social media every day, but there is little public knowledge of how these platforms work, and misconceptions abound. Enlisting citizen scientists helps us analyse the automated systems that lie behind the content that individual users see,’ says Professor Thomas. ‘By using a citizen science approach, we can also increase awareness of the potential social impacts of these systems and encourage informed public debate about the regulation and future development of these systems.’

Both citizen science projects will be seeking participants until mid-2022.

The Australian Search Experience 

The Australian Search Experience project investigates the role of personalisation in shaping the information that Australian internet users find online.

Professor Axel Bruns, Australian Laureate Fellow and Professor in the Digital Media Research Centre at Queensland University of Technology (QUT) said the project studies the personalisation of search results for critical news and information, across key platforms including Google and YouTube, based on the profiles these platforms establish for their different users.

‘Search engine personalisation may be influencing your search results and consequently shaping what you know of the world. This can affect personal decisions as well as collective decisions as a society – from how we spend our money, to whom we vote for, and to our attitudes on critical issues like the safety of COVID-19 vaccines.’

Launched in July 2021, the Australian Search Experience project has reached over 1,000 participants and collected more than 209 million search results. Research is at an early stage, and more participants are needed.

Australian Internet users can visit The Australian Search Experience website to join the project, and download a simple browser plugin to their computer.

This project is a partnership between the ARC Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making and Society (ADM+S) and the international research and advocacy organisation AlgorithmWatch.

The Australian Ad Observatory 

The Australian Ad Observatory project delves into Facebook’s use of ‘dark ads’, which target users on the basis of detailed information collected about them online.

The project, led by Professor Mark Andrejevic from Monash University and Professor Daniel Angus from QUT, aims to improve transparency around Facebook’s use of advertising.

Facebook users can visit The Australian Ad Observatory website and install an extension on their laptop or desktop Web browser. This extension collects the ads the participants see when they visit Facebook. Users can use the plugin to review the ads they have encountered and gain an understanding of how they are being profiled as targets for particular types of products or services.

‘The goal is to provide some visibility into a form of advertising that is no longer publicly visible because it is delivered on personal devices based on large, private collections of data,’ said Professor Angus. Personal user data is often seen as a goldmine for advertisers and online advertising works very differently to other more traditional mediums.’

The project is working in collaboration with the Centre for Global Indigenous Futures at Macquarie University to find out more about how advertisers may be targeting Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people who have historically been subjected to harmful stereotyping, misinformation campaigns, and predatory targeting by advertisers.

SEE ALSO

ADM+S research fellows receive international AI + Regulation Emerging Scholar Award

A statue of the roman goddess of justice in front of a laptop

ADM+S research fellows receive international AI + Regulation Emerging Scholar Award

Author Kathy Nickels
Date 15 December 2021

ADM+S research fellows Dr Henry Fraser and José-Miguel Bello y Villarino have received the 2022 Scotiabank Global AI + Regulation Emerging Scholar Award for best paper from the AI + Society Initiative at the University of Ottawa Centre for Law, Technology and Society.

The award recognises emerging scholars in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) and regulation and supports research seeking to (re)define problems and identify solutions to challenging issues related to ethical AI and technology development.

The successful paper was selected by an international review committee of leading scholars in the field of AI and Law. The paper Where residual risks reside: Lessons for Europe’s risk-based AI regulation from other domains explores the question of how to judge the acceptability of “residual risks” in the European Union’s Proposal for a Regulation laying down harmonized rules on Artificial Intelligence (the Proposal).

The Proposal is a risk-based regulation that prohibits certain uses of AI and imposes several layers of risk controls upon “high-risk” AI systems.

Much of the commentary on the Proposal has focused on the issue of what AI-systems should be prohibited, and which should be classified as high risk. This paper bypasses this threshold question, engaging instead with a key issue of implementation.

Dr Henry Fraser is based at QUT. His research focuses on how to use and develop civil liability laws to promote responsible automated decision-making (ADM).

Jose-Miguel Bello is based at the University of Sydney and his work is concerned with the policy implications of machine-assisted decision making and its implementation in regulatory terms. He has previously worked for the Commission and Council for the EU.

SEE ALSO

How TikTok could influence next year’s federal election

Tik Tok application on mobile phone

How TikTok could influence next year’s federal election

Author Kathy Nickels
Date 9 December 2021

TikTok is being used to reach younger voters ahead of next year’s federal election. One such account ‘Gen Z for Albo’ is run on a voluntary basis and includes content that adapts trending sounds and anti-Scott Morrison commentary and shows short clips of Liberal or National politicians stumbling during press conferences.

In contrast, a report last month found that a US-based marketing firm claiming to work for the Labor Party was offering to pay TikTok users to post anti-Scott Morrison sponsored content.

In this Triple J Hack article, Professor Dan Angus comments that “Campaigning has become dirtier, [and] there has been a rise in misinformation and disinformation in recent campaigns,” . He warns that with repeated exposure to these politically aligned TikTok videos there is a real risk of people picking up on false narratives.

Read the full article here

SEE ALSO

Sex Tech Hackathon 2022: Open to expressions of interest

Three hearts displayed on an LED screen

Sex Tech Hackathon 2022: Open to expressions of interest

Author Zahra Stardust
Date 15 December 2021

Are you interested in participating in a Public Interest Sex Tech Hackathon for Valentine’s Day?

What does public interest sex tech look like in an age of surveillance capitalism, when our data is collected and monetised at scale? How would inclusive design by and for marginalised communities impact the kinds of sex tech that is available?

Is it possible to design and govern ethical sex tech at scale? What would counter-surveillance sex tech look like, that studies ‘up’ to analyse the sexual practices of big tech?

The ADM+S has partnered with global software consultancy firm Thoughtworks and training academy for sextech start-ups and professionals, SexTech School to host the Sex Tech Hackathon 2022 in-person in Melbourne on 11, 12 and 13 February 2022.

The hackathon aims to brings together designers, technologists and communities to workshop how sexual technologies can be designed and governed in ways that prioritise public interest benefit.

It will investigate what intersectional, public interest sex tech could look like, how intimate data can be collected, stored and shared in more ethical ways, and whether ‘big data’ can be used for sexual and reproductive health, wellbeing, rights and pleasure.

The organisers are looking for a diverse range of participants and knowledges and are currently inviting Expressions of Interests.

  • People over 18 years of age
  • People with relevant skills, expertise or experience
  • People with ideas for creating public interest sex tech

In particular, organisers encourage:

  • People with special skills, such as fabricators, developers, software engineers, designers and technologists
  • People with particular expertise, such as sex therapists, sex educators, digital rights advocates and public health experts
  • People disproportionately impacted by sex tech design and governance, such as lesbian, gay, bisexual and queer communities, trans and gender diverse people, people with HIV, people with disability or sex workers.

For further information, visit the Sex Tech Hackathon 2022 website

Expressions of Interest can be submitted directly via this link and are due on 14 January 2022.

SEE ALSO

Social media companies could soon be forced to end anonymity for online trolls. But will this stop the trolling?

A male standing with his face pixelated out by a computing device.

Social media companies could soon be forced to end anonymity for online trolls. But will this stop the trolling?

Author Leah Hawkins
Date 24 November 2021

Australia’s federal government recently introduced legislation that would require social media companies to collect user details and hand over their identities in defamation cases. This is based on the assumption that abuse, bigotry and trolling on the internet is largely produced by anonymity.

In an article published in the ABC, ADM+S researchers explain how this premise is flawed, citing that the vast majority of online harm is perpetuated by verifiable accounts.

Associate Investigator Professor Daniel Angus notes that the worst offenders tend to use their real name, including some federal politicians. Instead of dealing with the epidemic of online harm, Prof Angus states that the proposed legislation is merely a distraction. “It’s the tried and trusted strategy of looking tough on something.”

Read the full article here.

SEE ALSO

Burnout by design? Warehouse and shipping workers pay the hidden cost of the holiday season

Warehouse

Burnout by design? Warehouse and shipping workers pay the hidden cost of the holiday season

Author Leah Hawkins
Date 30 November 2021

Christmas and Black Friday are periods of intense pressure for e-commerce workers. In an industry with high turnover and injury rates, there are concerns that working conditions are overwhelming by design.

In an article published in The Conversation, the team behind the ADM+S research project ‘Automated Precarity’ share the concerning statistics behind working conditions at Amazon and similar companies. Research has shown that the pressure of long hours, high speeds and low job security leads to high attrition rates that benefit the companies that workers resign from.

Automated Precarity is a research project that aims to study the experience of Australian e-commerce workers and ascertain if working conditions are comparable to those overseas. Workers in the industry can share their experiences in an anonymous interview for the project and receive a $50 Visa gift card.

Read the full article here.

Participate in the research project here.

SEE ALSO

Artificial intelligence has probably already made decisions about you. Here’s why that matters

Two people walking through an airport on security screen with their details displayed beside them

Artificial intelligence has probably already made decisions about you. Here’s why that matters

Author Leah Hawkins
Date 30 November 2021

Artificial intelligence is often considered as making neutral decisions based on purely mathematical analysis of data. While this is somewhat true, the reality of human bias and exploitation undercuts this utopian vision.

In an article published in the ABC, ADM+S Research Fellow Dr Jathan Sadowski describes the prevalence of automated decision-making systems in our everyday lives, from assessing insurance claims to recommending songs on Spotify. These algorithmic programs sort through massive amounts of data in order to make informed decisions about humans—what they like, if they can pay back a loan, or whether or not they should receive a fine.

There is, however, growing ethical concern about the use of these programs. Often the data they use is sorted by exploited workers in marginalised communities, and the decisions they make show gender and racial biases indicating the human origins of their programming.

So how can these technologies become more transparent and accountable, and what kind of technologies are compatible with a democratic society? “That’s a question more of us need to consider, since the answer will have a profound impact on everybody,” said Dr Sadowski.

Read the full article here

SEE ALSO

Prof Jean Burgess elected to the Australian Academy of the Humanities

Professor Jean Burgess

Prof Jean Burgess elected to the Australian Academy of the Humanities

Author Kathy Nickels
Date 26 November 2021

Professor Jean Burgess, Associate Director of the ARC Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making and Society (ADM+S), has been elected as one of the 25 new Fellows of the Australian Academy of the Humanities – the highest honour for humanities scholars in Australia.

Academy President, Lesley Head FASSA FAHA announced the new Fellows yesterday.

“I am honoured to welcome our new Fellows to the Academy, elected in recognition of their distinguished achievement in the humanities and arts disciplines and for their outstanding contribution to Australian cultural life,” said Professor Head.

Professor Jean Burgess is one of Australia’s leading experts on the social and cultural aspects of digital media technologies and platforms.

ADM+S Centre Director Julian Thomas welcomed the announcement, saying “Professor Burgess’s election to the Academy is richly merited recognition of her remarkable contribution to the emergence of digital media as a field of scholarly inquiry in Australia and internationally.”

As ADM+S Associate Director, Professor Burgess is instrumental in connecting national and international researchers and partners across government, industry and the community to work towards the Centre’s vision – to develop responsible, ethical and inclusive automated decision-making systems for the benefit of all Australians.

In total 40 new members were elected to the Australian Academy of Humanities Fellowship including Fellows, Corresponding Fellows, and Honorary Fellows. Read the full list of new members on the Australian Academy of the Humanities website.

SEE ALSO

Kate has faced years of abuse on social media. She says it’s time platforms did something about it

Person pressing love heart icon on device

Kate has faced years of abuse on social media. She says it’s time platforms did something about it

Summary Leah Hawkins
Date 24 November 2021

Original Article Rosalie Gillett

Online harm has become a fact of life on many social media platforms, particularly in cases of women experiencing virulent misogyny. These spaces are largely unregulated, and instigators are able to perpetuate abuse without threat of consequence.

Dr Rosalie Gillett (Research Fellow at ADM+S and ABC Top 5 Humanities Scholar) writes about the need for more robust online regulation in an article published in the ABC. While companies such as Bumble and Twitter have taken steps to allow users to access therapy services and better curate their online experience, online platforms are still not doing enough to regulate the “Wild West” spaces of the internet.

Moderating abusive content is difficult and expensive, but these companies, with their massive resources, can focus on implementing anti-harassment measures into the building blocks of their programming, and understand how online functions by listening to the women experiencing daily abuse on their platforms.

Read the full article here

ABC Top 5 Humanities residency

SEE ALSO

Telstra partners with ADM+S Centre to develop the first comprehensive study of digital inclusion in remote First Nations communities

Two people using tablet devices

Telstra partners with ADM+S Centre to develop the first comprehensive study of digital inclusion in remote First Nations communities

Author Loren Dela Cruz
Date 18 November 2021

The ARC Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making and Society (ADM+S) has partnered with Telstra on a four-year study which will measure digital inclusion across Australia’s remote Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities.

The objectives of the project titled ‘Mapping the Digital Gap’ are to:

  1. Generate the most detailed account to date of the distribution of digital inclusion and uses of digital and media services within remote First Nations communities, and to track changes over time; and
  2. Support the development of appropriate community-driven strategies for addressing identified barriers to digital inclusion and building local capabilities to enable informed decision-making. These capabilities include the relevant data collection and analysis skills involved in the measurement of digital inclusion.

The project comes at a critical time with a new Closing the Gap target to close the digital inclusion gap by 2026, and with the digital transformation to online service delivery driving the need for improved access, affordability and digital ability throughout remote Australia.

Lauren Ganley, Head of First Nations Strategy & Engagement at Telstra, will work alongside ADM+S researchers on this comprehensive study, which is being undertaken in partnership with local organisations in up to 12 remote First Nations communities spread throughout remote Australia.

“Improving digital inclusion is a fundamental part of Telstra’s purpose – to build a connected future so everyone can thrive,” said Lauren.

“We can’t improve inclusion if we don’t properly understand the scale of the challenge and the barriers faced by remote First Nations communities. Which is why this research is so important and so timely.”

The project builds on the work of the Australian Digital Inclusion Index (ADII), an annual study of Australia’s online participation, led by Telstra, the ADM+S Centre based at the School of Media and Communication at RMIT, and the Centre for Social Impact Swinburne.

ADM+S Centre Director Prof Julian Thomas said, “We’re delighted to be working with Telstra and First Nations communities on this timely project. We believe that there is an urgent need to improve access to digital services, affordability and digital ability for First Nations peoples across Australia”.

For more information visit the project page.

 

For media enquiries please contact:

  • ARC Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making and Society at RMIT: Loren Dela Cruz on +613 9925 0226 or loren.delacruz@rmit.edu.au
  • Telstra: Steve Carey on 0413 988 640 or media@team.telstra.com

SEE ALSO

5 ADM+S Investigators Recognised in The Australian’s List of Top Researchers

5 ADM+S Investigators Recognised in The Australian’s List of Top Researchers

Author Loren Dela Cruz & Kathy Nickels
Date 15 November 2021

Prof Axel Bruns, Prof Jean Burgess, Prof Deborah Lupton, Prof Sarah Pink, and Prof Haiqing Yu from the ARC Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making and Society (ADM+S) have been recognised in The Australian’s 2021 Research Magazine which lists “the best researchers and the best research institutions in Australia” (The Australian 2021).

The annual Research Magazine acknowledges the talent and dedication of Australian researchers by comprehensively scanning online data to identify the best researcher and the best research institution in each field, based on the excellence of their research and the impact it has in discovery and scholarship.

ADM+S Chief Investigators Prof Axel Bruns, Prof Jean Burgess and Prof Sarah Pink were listed among Australia’s top 40 lifetime achievers in research, chosen for the consistent excellence of their work and the impact they’ve had in the field of Humanities, Literature & Arts.

ADM+S Chief Investigator Prof Deborah Lupton was named the top researcher in the field of Communication, and Humanities, Literature & Arts (general), and Associate Investigator Dr Haiqing Yu was recognised as the top researcher in Chinese Studies & History in Australia’s top 250 researchers in 2021.

Read The Australian’s 2021 Research Magazine.

SEE ALSO

Call for Participants: Seniors Using Transport in Melbourne

Grandpa and son travelling on public transport

Call for Participants: Seniors Using Transport in Melbourne

Author Loren Dela Cruz
Date 11 November 2021

ADM+S PhD Student Jiyoon Lee, based at Monash University, is investigating how to improve the design of transport services for senior citizens in Melbourne. Her research project ‘Mobility-as-a-Service for Senior Citizens’ (project ID 30005) focuses on the integration of mobility services in a single digital platform.

As part of her fieldwork, Jiyoon is calling for participants aged 65 years or older, who use private or public transport in Melbourne to get involved in her research. Participants will be asked to complete a short survey, take part in two 1-hour interviews, and keep a travel diary for a week. As a token of appreciation, each participant will receive a $50 gift card at the completion of the research.

Based on the insights gathered, Jiyoon will propose design strategies and guidelines for future digital transport services to support seniors’ mobility experience and their social inclusion.

To participate in this project or for more information, please contact Jiyoon Lee at jiyoon.lee@monash.edu.

SEE ALSO

Event: Intersectionalities of Automated Decision Making and Race/Ethnicity

Algorithms of Oppression

Event: Intersectionalities of Automated Decision Making and Race/Ethnicity

Author Loren Dela Cruz
Date 27 October 2021

Join us for a critical dialogue with Assoc. Prof Safiya Noble, Prof Bronwyn Carlson and Karaitiana Taiuru,  hosted by the ADM+S Centre’s Social Services Focus Area.

Automated decision making (ADM) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) are rapidly expanding into all aspects of our lives and radically reshaping our experiences of ourselves as well as our relations with one another, governmental entities, and corporations. Often framed as efficient, accurate and objective, these technologies can have widely disparate impacts across populations and societies, often exacerbating pre-existing inequalities, discrimination, and disadvantage. This event is part of a series of critical engagements with the various ways ADM/AI intersect with race/ethnicity, gender/sex, class, dis/ability, and space.

Wednesday 17 November 2021
10am- 11.30am (AEDT)
Online via Zoom
Register here

For more information, please visit the event page or contact Prof Paul Henman at p.henman@uq.edu.au.

Presenters:

  • Assoc. Prof Safiya U. Noble is an Associate Professor of Gender Studies and African American Studies at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) where she serves as the Co-Founder and Director of the UCLA Center for Critical Internet Inquiry (C2i2). She is the author of a best-selling book on racist and sexist algorithmic bias in commercial search engines, entitled Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism (NYU Press 2018) and co-editor of The Intersectional Internet: Race, Sex, Culture and Class Online (Peter Lang 2016) and Emotions, Technology & Design (Elsevier 2016)
  • Prof Bronwyn Carlson is an Aboriginal woman who was born on and lives on D’harawal Country in NSW Australia and is Professor of Indigenous Studies at Macquarie University. She is also the founding and managing editor of the Journal of Global Indigeneity and the Director of The Centre for Global Indigenous Futures. Bronwyn is the author of Indigenous Digital Life: The Practice and Politics of Being Indigenous on Social Media (Palgrave 2021) and The Politics of Identity: Who Counts as Aboriginal Today? (Aboriginal Studies Press 2016), and co-editor of Indigenous People Rise Up: The Global Ascendancy of Social Media Activism (Rutgers UP 2021).
  • Karaitiana Taiuru JP is an interdisciplinary Māori academic and activist. He is an advocate and proponent for digital Māori rights, cultural appropriation, data sovereignty/digital colonialism, te reo Māori revitalisation with technology, and Māori representation and Intellectual Property Rights.

SEE ALSO

ADM+S Researchers Speak at 2021 Australian Social Policy Conference

Australian Social Policy Conference

ADM+S Researchers Speak at 2021 Australian Social Policy Conference

Author Loren Dela Cruz
Date 25 October 2021

Several researchers from the ARC Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making & Society (ADM+S) are slated to present at the 2021 Australian Social Policy Conference (ASPC) being held online over the next two weeks from October 25 to November 5.

The biennial conference, hosted by the UNSW Social Policy Research Centre, is the country’s leading event for the discussion and dissemination of social policy research.

The ASPC provides a forum for leading national and international researchers and analysts from government and community social welfare sectors in Australia and internationally to present their research findings and debate their implications, attracting participants from academia, government and the community social welfare sector internationally.

“This is the first time the conference has featured sessions on the role of digital technology in social policy and service delivery. The centrality of people from the ARC Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making and Society demonstrate how its work is leading these important research agenda, policy developments and public debates,” said ADM+S Chief Investigator Professor Paul Henman who is chairing a number of sessions at the conference.

Conference presentations by ADM+S Centre researchers include:

  • Mapping Automated Decision Making in Social Services in Australia
    Dr Lyndal Sleep, Brooke Coco & Prof Paul Henman, University of Queensland
  • Outsourced ADM in disability provisioning: lessons for Australia from the US and the UK
    Dr Georgia van Toorn, UNSW Sydney
  • Encountering the Digital Welfare State: Voices at the interface
    Dr Scarlet Wilcock, University of Sydney
    with Dr Roba Abbas & Dr Andrew Whelan, University of Wollongong
  • Equity and Personalisation in the NDIS: ADM Compatible or not?
    Prof Terry Carney, University of Sydney
  • Administrative Justice in a Digital World: Challenges and Solutions
    Prof Paul Henman, University of Queensland
  • Triaged out? People with disability and critical care decisions in the COVID pandemic
    Prof Jackie Leach Scully, UNSW Sydney
  • The participatory dynamic animates the CRPD: Nothing about Us Unless it is Led by Us
    Prof Paul Harpur, University of Queensland

For more information relating to the event, please visit the conference website or email ASPC@unsw.edu.au.

SEE ALSO

How does Facebook control the ads you see? The truth is out there

Girl using laptop with dog on her lap

How does Facebook control the ads you see? The truth is out there

Source QUT Media
Date 21 October 2021

A national ‘citizen science’ project has been launched to delve into Facebook’s use of ‘dark ads’ that target users based on detailed information collected about them online.

The Australian Ad Observatory project, is an ARC Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making and Society (ADM+S) research initiative led by QUT’s Professor Daniel Angus and Professor Mark Andrejevic from Monash University and aims to provide accountability and transparency around Facebook’s use of advertising.

To find out how they are being targeted participants can install an extension on their laptop or desktop Web browser that collects all the ads they see when they go on Facebook. Users will gain an understanding of the pattern of the ads and an idea of whether they are being targeted for particular types of products or services.

The extension also allows researchers to see overall patterns of ad targeting and only collects the ads (posts identified as ‘sponsored content’) and not any personal information other than demographic information supplied by users when installing the extension.

“The goal is to provide some visibility into a form of advertising that is no longer publicly visible because it is delivered on personal devices based on large, private collections of data,” said Professor Angus.

“Far removed from the free and open ideals of the early web, today the vast bulk of our personal data is held within ‘walled gardens’ controlled by a handful of tech giants such as Facebook.

“This data is a goldmine for advertisers and online advertising works very differently to other more traditional mediums.

“With television, anyone watching the same channel in the same region sees the same ad. On your personal digital devices, however, the ad may be targeted to you based on detailed information about your past behaviour, your interests, and your preferences.

“It can also be tailored to you based on a psychological profile that suggests what type of advertising appeal might work best for you. It could be fear based, for example, or a humour-based one.

“The use of ‘dark ads’ has made it possible to discriminate in online advertising and to engage in forms of stereotyping and manipulation that are invisible to consumers.”

Computer cursor pointing to Facebook banner

Watch one of the project’s lead researchers, Professor Dan Angus talk about the Australian Ad Observatory Project on Channel Seven’s Sunrise show here

Professor Angus said Facebook’s reliance on personalised forms of customized advertising dates back to the launch of its Social Ads functionality in 2007.

“Advertising had appeared on the platform previously but Social Ads accelerated Facebook’s course towards the consumer surveillance network it has ultimately become,” he said.

Professor Angus added there was increasing speculation about how Facebook decides what ads its users see.

“While they have provided some transparency via the Facebook Ad Library, this offers significantly limited information, is not independently verified, and removes inactive ads from its public database,” he said.

“The lack of information on algorithmically targeted advertising practices means that we have few ways of knowing if there are breaches of advertising codes of practice, or other potentially problematic activities occurring.

“We also do not know how the ad environment is being transformed by the detailed tracking of individual users. The platforms claim this type of advertising is more relevant to users, but everyday experience suggests these claims may be overblown.

“Advertising, which plays an important role in shaping consumer values and associations, has a long history of predatory targeting and stereotyping of vulnerable groups. We need to be able to see ads and how they are being targeted in order to determine whether these practices persist online. Without some form of accountability, advertisers and platforms have less incentive to avoid socially harmful practices.

“That’s where the Australian Ad Observatory project comes in and the more participants we can attract, the greater the transparency.”

Professor Angus said the project was working in collaboration with the Centre for Global Indigenous Futures at Macquarie University to find out more about how advertisers target Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people who have historically been subjected to harmful stereotyping and predatory targeting by advertisers.

Find out more or join the project: https://staging.admscentre.org.au/adobservatory/

Media contact:
Amanda Weaver, QUT Media, 3138 3151 or amanda.weaver@qut.edu.au
After hours, Rod Chester, QUT Media team leader, 0407 585 901, media@qut.edu.au

SEE ALSO

Digital inclusion improving nationally, but more to do on affordability and equal access

Australian Digital Inclusion Index 2021 (ADII)

Digital inclusion improving nationally, but more to do on affordability and equal access

Source Australian Digital Inclusion Index 2021
Date 15 October 2021

The Australian Digital Inclusion Index 2021 (ADII), published today, shows digital inclusion at the national level is improving, but a substantial number of Australians remain excluded.

With the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic requiring greater reliance on online technologies to manage daily life, digital inclusion is more important than ever; and while the nation has seen improvements overall, these improvements are not evenly shared by all Australians.

Key findings from the 2021 Index:

  • Affordability remains central to closing the digital divide. Based on our Affordability measure, 14% of all Australians would need to pay more than 10% of their household income to gain quality, and reliable connectivity.
  • The national Index score in 2021 is 71.1, up 3.6 points from the 2020 score of 67.5.
  • Australian Capital Territory ranked highest with an Index score of 77. The least digitally included states are South Australia (69) and Tasmania (66).
  • The divide between metropolitan and regional areas has narrowed but remains marked. Regional areas recorded an Index score in 2021 of 67.4. This is 3.6 points less than the national average (71.1), and 5.5 points less than metropolitan Australia (72.9).
  • The percentage of highly excluded Australians has decreased between 2020 and 2021. In 2020, 17% of the Australian population were highly excluded (defined as recording an Index score of 45 or below). In 2021, this has dropped to 11% of the population.
  • The percentage of excluded Australians (defined as recording an Index score of above 45 and below 61) has not changed since 2020 and remains at 17% of the national population.
  • Taken together, the number of highly excluded and excluded Australians is substantial, equalling 28% of the national population in 2021.
  • Cyber safety is also a significant concern for highly excluded and excluded Australians, with this concern rising 3% between 2020 and 2021. In 2021, 20% of highly excluded and excluded Australians are so concerned about privacy and scams that it limits their internet use.

*ADII scores range from 0 to 100. The higher the score, the greater the level of digital inclusion. ADII scores are relative: they allow comparisons across different social groups and geographic areas, and over time.

* ADII scores may not add up due to rounding.

“Recent experience has underlined the importance of affordable and accessible digital services for all Australians. The Index results show we have more work to do to ensure that all Australians are included as we move online,” said Distinguished Professor Julian Thomas, Director of the ARC Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making and Society at RMIT.

For Telstra, understanding the gaps across Australia helps them make sure they’re directing their support to the right areas.

“This data helps us make sure that we’re targeting our support to areas where we can really make a difference,” said Lyndall Stoyles, Telstra’s Group Executive for Sustainability, External Affairs and Legal.

“We’re building a connected future so everyone can thrive and, so that everyone truly means everyone,” Ms Stoyles said.

“Telstra runs a range of targeted programs that help people access, afford and develop digital ability whether that’s helping seniors be more tech savvy or providing supported services for vulnerable customers.”

First developed in 2015, the ADII is an annual study led by Telstra, the ARC Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making and Society at RMIT, and the Centre for Social Impact (CSI) Swinburne that provides a comprehensive picture of Australia’s online participation by measuring three key dimensions of digital inclusion: Access, Affordability, and Digital Ability.

The Index helps focus policymakers, businesses, and community organisations on the issue of digital inclusion and importantly informs the development of more effective policies, products, and programs to improve digital inclusion.

“The changes to Australians’ daily lives since the emergence of COVID-19 include huge digital uplift so that we can do more online,” said CSI Swinburne’s Director, Distinguished Professor Jo Barraket.

“This has deepened the digital divide and we need more than ever to understand and address the factors that are leaving people and places behind.”

Updates to the Index in 2021:

The Index was updated in 2021 using a new data set and methodology in response to a series of emerging challenges and opportunities, including:

  • Rapid and ongoing changes in digital technologies.
  • The growing significance of the online distribution and consumption of consumer and public services.
  • Maximising data utility and responding to requests from stakeholders for richer data insights that include the public release of more of the data that underpins the index.
  • Interest from stakeholders in having access to a customised digital inclusion survey and reporting tool they could use to measure digital inclusion in their own communities.

The updated Index is underpinned by a purpose-built digital inclusion survey and also includes new interactive data dashboards.

For more information visit the Australian Digital Inclusion Index website.

For media interviews please contact:

SEE ALSO

Megan Kelleher and Kelsie Nabben Participate in International Research Sprint

Megan Kelleher (Left) and Kelsie Nabben (Right)
Megan Kelleher (Left) and Kelsie Nabben (Right)

Megan Kelleher and Kelsie Nabben Participate in International Research Sprint

Author Loren Dela Cruz
Date 12 October 2021

ADM+S PhD researchers Megan Kelleher and Kelsie Nabben, both based at RMIT University, have been selected to participate in Harvard University’s Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society and The New School’s Platform Cooperativism Consortium Fall 2021 Research Sprint.

The Alternative Data Futures: Cooperative Principles, Data Trusts, and the Digital Economy Research Sprint brings together researchers and practitioners from around the world to investigate the design and dilemmas of data trusts and cooperatives and how they can help communities.

Megan and Kelsie are among the 12 participants who are taking part in the Sprint—a mix of early-career researchers, cooperative leaders, and activists from 8 countries across 4 continents.

Kelsie said she is excited to work with “some of the best researchers and speakers on data governance in the world. It is an incredible opportunity to learn and produce research on community data governance models, that shape how society operates.”

“I am honoured to join an inspiring cohort of cutting-edge thinkers who are working on and shaping the tools and frameworks that will catalyse the system reset that the world so desperately needs,” said Megan.

The virtual sprint is currently underway and will culminate in an international conference presentation.

SEE ALSO

Participate in the Automated Decision-Making Wikipedia Edit-a-thon

Blurred people walking across yellow crossing

Participate in the Automated Decision-Making Wikipedia Edit-a-thon

Author Loren Dela Cruz
Date 12 October 2021

The ADM+S Centre’s Wikimedian-In-Residence, Dr Amanda Lawrence, is hosting an Automated Decision-Making Wikipedia Edit-a-thon to improve the information related to ADM on Wikipedia, Wikidata and other Wikimedia platforms.

The edit-a-thon will focus on refining this stub page on automated decision-making as well as improving and creating pages for related content, people and organisations.

ADM+S Wikipedia Edit-a-thon
10am- 1pm
Wednesday 27 October 2021
Online
Register here

Dr Amanda Lawrence is an Australian researcher and librarian specialising in open knowledge, research communication and research infrastructure for policy and practice. Amanda is Secretary for Wikimedia Australia Committee and has been an editor of Wikipedia and Wikidata since 2015.

If you have any questions please contact Amanda at amanda.lawrence@rmit.edu.au.

SEE ALSO

Tackling the challenges of automation, algorithms and AI in news and media

Audience and panel at the ADM+S News and Media Research Symposium

Tackling the challenges of automation, algorithms and AI in news and media

Author Kathy Nickels
Date 7 October 2021

Researchers and industry experts gathered at the ARC Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making and Society (ADM+S) News and Media Research Symposium last week to address crucial challenges associated with the use of automation, algorithms and artificial intelligence in news, media and online entertainment.

The ADM+S News and Media Research Symposium, hosted at QUT, was co-sponsored by QUT’s Digital Media Research Centre. The event showcased the breadth and depth of research conducted at ADM+S in the news and media focus area to over 150 attendees in-person and online.

National and international delegates discussed issues related to automated decision-making systems used in search engines, recommendation systems, personalised newsfeeds, content moderation systems, and programmatic advertising.

The launch of the Australian Ad Observatory project, and early findings from the Australian Search Experience project were just some of the event’s highlights.

“It is very exciting to have these two major projects underway”, said ADM+S News and Media Focus Area leader Professor Axel Bruns.

“Both of them help to create more transparency about how the major digital media platforms use algorithms and automation to determine what information, content and advertising different Australian users see – and we actively engage the public in this process.”

The event also marked the transition of leadership of the News and Media Focus Area from Professor Bruns to incoming co-leaders Professor Jean Burgess (QUT) and Dr James Meese (RMIT).

Dr Meese said, “Axel has been a fantastic leader throughout the Focus Area’s critical start-up phase, launching major projects while also growing our Australia-wide research team. We’re excited about continuing his great work and furthering the conversation around these critical issues.”

The event provided an opportunity to engage with partners and organisations in the news and media industry including ABC, ABC RMIT Fact Check, Australian Communications Consumer Action Network Limited (ACCAN), Australian Council of Social Service (ACOSS), AlgorithmWatch, Consumer Policy Research Centre (CPRC), Consumers Health Forum of Australia, Data & Society, First Nations Media Australia (FNMA), Gradient Institute, Griffith University, Hans Bredow Institute, Macquarie University, Nanyang Technological University, Oxford Internet Institute, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, Torres Strait Islander Media Association (TSIMA), and the Victorian Information Commissioner (OVIC).

Watch the session recordings of the ADM+S News and Media Research Symposium on Youtube.

Session 01: Overview of Critical Challenges and Opportunities in News and Media Around Automated Decision-Making
Session 02: Search Engines and Recommendation Systems
Session 03: Search Personalisation and Polarisation
Session 04: News and Automation
Session 05: Automated Content Curation and Moderation: Problematic and ‘Borderline’ Content
Session 06: Platform Governance: Race, Gender and Sexuality
Session 07: Digital Inclusion and Media Use in Remote First Nations Communities
Session 08: Facebook Advertising: The Australian Ad Observatory Project

Read about other projects related to News and Media being undertaken at the ADM+S here.

SEE ALSO

Privatising the sky: drone delivery promises comfort and speed, but at a cost to workers and communities

A drone delivering a package

Privatising the sky: drone delivery promises comfort and speed, but at a cost to workers and communities

Author Kathy Nickels
Date 5 October 2021

Drone delivery company Wing recently celebrated 100,000 deliveries, with their two biggest trial sites in Canberra and Logan. The COVID-19 pandemic is helping companies like Wing to accelerate their agenda, as they can promise less congestion, less consumer mobility, and less social contact.

The groundwork is already underway but what is the real cost of delivery drones in our skies? This piece from The Conversation considers some of the impacts of drone delivery including workforce expectations, environmental concerns and regulation.

Read the full article here

SEE ALSO

Australian Ad Observatory Project aims to make Facebook’s ‘dark ads’ publicly accessible

Three people looking at laptop screen at night

Australian Ad Observatory Project aims to make Facebook’s ‘dark ads’ publicly accessible

Source Monash University Media
Date 3 October 2021

The ADM+S Centre launched its latest data donation project on October 1. This project is asking members of the public to install a browser extension that aims to provide accountability and transparency around the social media giant’s use of targeted advertising.

The Australian Ad Observatory will collect Facebook users’ personalised or ‘dark’ ads and develop strategies for addressing the potential harms associated with them.

The project is led by Monash University’s Professor Mark Andrejevic as part of the ARC Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making and Society (ADM+S).

Researchers from ADM+S developed the tool to attempt to make public the ads that are being served to people online and how advertising is distributed across demographic groups.

Once Facebook users install the browser plugin it will identify sponsored advertising content, take a snapshot of the content and send it back to a central server, allowing researchers to build an independent archive of advertising materials that are shown to Facebook users.

“Dark ads pose a host of potential social harms, from discrimination, the propagation of racist or gender stereotyping, and the spread of false and harmful information,” Professor Andrejevic said.

“It is important to hold advertising systems accountable for the forms of messaging they promulgate.

“Online advertising and digital marketing takes place on a mass scale and a large majority of its distribution is automated – therefore the systems don’t know when they’re engaging in regressive, racist or sexual activity as they are driven by the goal of maximising clicks and responses.”

A recent survey of 1,094 people conducted by Essential Research on behalf of the ADM+S Centre revealed less than half (41 per cent) of participants felt Facebook advertising was relevant to them.

Just 30 per cent of respondents said they were comfortable with their personal data being used for advertising purposes, and more than three-quarters said Facebook should be transparent about how it distributes advertising on its newsfeed.

The ADM+S tool builds on a study conducted by ProPublica which was designed to track political advertising on Facebook, as well as a 2020 pilot study by Monash researchers of 136 Australian Facebook users who donated ads to researchers for analysis.

The Monash study was funded by the Australian Communications Consumer Action Network.

“Our goal is to foster a conversation about the need for public transparency in online advertising, which is transforming our media environment,” Professor Andrejevic said.

“With targeted advertising, there is a risk that society could lose the ability to form a shared understanding of current events, of political figures, of collective experiences if we are all receiving different messages.

“It’s a customised digital virtual reality where we get our own ‘secret’ messages invisible to others and now, more than ever, we are seeing the damage of people using social media to promulgate dangerous messages, particularly around COVID-19 and vaccines misinformation.”

The tool is available as a plugin for anyone to install on their web browser and does not collect any personally identifying information or anything that is not an ad.

It can be removed or disabled at any time, and has received ethics clearance.

For more information about the Australian Ad Observatory and how you can participate, visit here.

SEE ALSO

AI, algorithms, and automation changing our media landscape

Brisbane city and river with a city cat travelling on the water

AI, algorithms, and automation changing our media landscape

Author Kathy Nickels
Date 29 September 2021

News and other media platforms in Australia and elsewhere face growing challenges from automated decision-making, but the future is not all bad say researchers from the ARC Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making and Society gathering this week for a conference on the topic.

The ARC Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making and Society (ADM+S) News and Media Research Symposium is an in-person and online event on 30 September and 1 October, hosted at the QUT Kelvin Grove campus.

Speakers include Professor Axel Bruns, an internationally renowned Internet researcher in QUT’s Digital Media Research Centre, who will present early findings of the Australian Search Experience project involving ADM+S researchers and the international research and advocacy organisation AlgorithmWatch.

The symposium will be launching the anticipated Australian Ad Observatory project led by Professor Mark Andrejevic (Monash University). The Australian Ad Observatory is investigating the potential harms of customised targeted advertising online. The project uses a data donation model to collect the ads that users are being served on Facebook.

Other topics being covered over the two days include news and automation, digital inclusion and media use in remote First Nations communities, Facebook advertising, automated content curation and moderation, and platform governance on matters relating to race, gender, and sexuality.

Professor Bruns said news and media was chosen as the first of four focus areas over the lifetime of the ADM+S Centre because automation, algorithms, and artificial intelligence already posed some crucial challenges for this industry, and that further research on these topics was urgently required.

“What we couldn’t have anticipated at the time was the extent to which acute events like the COVID-19 pandemic would raise the stakes in the battle against disinformation,” Professor Bruns said.

Along with Professor Bruns, other ADM+S-linked speakers include the Centre’s director Professor Julian Thomas (RMIT), Professor Jean Burgess (QUT), Professor Axel Bruns (QUT), Matthias Spielkamp (AlgorithmWatch),  Professor Wiebke Loosen (Hans Bredow Institute), Edson Tandoc Jr. (Nanyang Technological University), Dr Robyn Caplan (Data & Society), Russell Skelton (RMIT ABC Fact Check) Simon Elvery (ABC), Professor Mark Andrejevic (Monash University), Professor Daniel Angus (QUT), Professor Kath Albury (Swinburne University), Dr Timothy Graham (QUT), Professor Bronwyn Carlson (Macquarie University), Dr Rosalie Gillett (QUT) and Dr Jeffrey Chan (RMIT).

Joining the symposium, with expertise in their respective fields, are guest speakers Rasmus Kleis Nielsen (Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism), David Tomchak (Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford), Diat Alferink (Torres Strait Islander Media Association), and Dennis Stokes (First Nations Media Australia).

ADM+S was established in 2019 to investigate how rapidly emerging autonomous decision-making technologies, already replacing human judgement in health, social services, transport, and the media, are impacting on society.

Headquartered at RMIT, it connects researchers and other experts from nine Australian universities, and 22 academic and industry partner organisations from Australia, Europe, Asia and America.

See the full program and register to attend the symposium online at the ARC Centre of Excellence | Automated Decision Making | ADM+S (admscentre.org.au/researchsymposium).

Originally published as QUT Media release Media landscape now shaped by AI, algorithms, and automation

SEE ALSO

ADM+S Launches Media Training Pilot Program

Two women talking at table

ADM+S Launches Media Training Pilot Program

Author Sally Storey
Date 24 September 2021

The ADM+S Centre’s Research Training and Career Development Committee have selected the first round of participants to take part in a bespoke media training program.

The program will consist of tailored, private sessions with global branding and design expert Dr Anna Harrison who will help researchers develop their skills in communications, research translation, personal branding, and media presence. Participants will be equipped with the confidence to engage with media and be on their way to building their profile as a researcher, lending credibility to their own career and that of the collective ADM+S Centre.

Congratulations to the following ADM+S researchers selected to participate in our pilot program:

  • Dr Henry Fraser (Research Fellow, Queensland University of Technology)
  • Megan Kelleher (PhD Student, RMIT University)
  • Dr Anjalee de Silva (Research Fellow, University of Melbourne)
  • Dr Emma Quilty (Research Fellow, Monash University)
  • Laura McLean (PhD Student, Monash University)
  • Nataliya Ilyushina (Research Fellow, RMIT University)

A waitlist is now open for ADM+S researchers interested in participating in the media training program in future. To join the waitlist please contact adms@rmit.edu.au.

SEE ALSO

Meet Lauren Kelly, ADM+S Scholarship Recipient

Scholarship Recipient

Meet Lauren Kelly, ADM+S Scholarship Recipient

Author(s) Sally Storey and Loren Dela Cruz
Date 22 September 2021

After completing a Master of International Relations at the University of Melbourne, Lauren Kelly had always been interested in pursuing her PhD but was waiting for the right opportunity. When she came across the ADM+S Centre’s Scholarship, she knew it would be a great fit for her research interests in labour, technology, and the future of work.

“Receiving an ADM+S PhD scholarship means a lot to me. I’ve already learned so much from this community of incredible scholars. It feels good to be contributing the broader goals of the Centre and I really hope to give back as much as I can, ” says Lauren.

Growing up, the topic of work was a big one in Lauren’s family and early on she became aware that unfair or exploitative working conditions can affect a whole family. Having worked a lot of difficult jobs herself, Lauren’s interest in work and labour conditions deepened.

“In my early 20s I was unironically fired from a call centre for reading Marx’s “Capital” in between calls (we weren’t allowed to read)! Now, reflecting on that is quite funny and I realise it was definitely a life changing moment for me. I got interested in unionism after that and things went from there,” says Lauren who has now worked in the Australian union movement for five years.

Lauren’s research at the ADM+S Centre is interdisciplinary, spanning digital media, labour studies and science and technology studies. She is investigating automated decision-making systems in Australia’s supermarket warehouses, and considers what technological change means for workers. Her research suggests a reimagining of the Australian supermarket is currently underway, speeding up the trend towards on-demand and precarious labour. Lauren has recently published an article ‘Coles and Woolworths are moving to robot warehouses and on-demand labour as home deliveries soar’ in The Conversation and was interviewed by ABC Radio’s James Valentine.

When considering her future hopes and career aspirations, Lauren seeks to influence public narratives surrounding automation and the future of work in Australia and hopes to publish her PhD research as a book.

Follow Lauren Kelly on Twitter @laurenkatekelly.

SEE ALSO

Meet Rakesh Kumar, ADM+S Scholarship Recipient

Scholarship Recipient

Meet Rakesh Kumar, ADM+S Scholarship Recipient

Author Sally Storey
Date 21 September 2021

Rakesh Kumar is a recipient of an ADM+S PhD Scholarship at the Centre’s University of Western Sydney node, under the supervision of Chief Investigator Prof Heather Horst.

With experience in both the corporate and private sectors in technology and programmes enhancing employability of students and young people, Rakesh is interested in examining the algorithmic conditioning of platform decisions for migrant digital businesses and whether biases faced by migrants in real life is mitigated or exacerbated by these algorithms.

Rakesh’s thesis ‘Platforms, Labour, Migration: Entrepreneurial platform work among Indian migrants in Australia’ will look at entrepreneurial work on digital platforms performed by Indian migrants in Australia, specifically around digital food and online wellness.

Through his research Rakesh hopes to understand how and why Indian migrants are exploring entrepreneurial work on digital platforms. Further, how platforms condition the entrepreneurial work experience of migrants and issues of bias, control and surveillance around recommendation engines and predictive analytics. Rakesh also aims to explore whether this new trend is structural and conceptualise issues around capital, labour in this phenomenon.

SEE ALSO

Prof Deborah Lupton receives 2021 DASSH International Award

Deborah Lupton

Prof Deborah Lupton receives 2021 DASSH International Award

Author Loren Dela Cruz
Date 21 September 2021

ADM+S Chief Investigator Prof Deborah Lupton is the recipient of the 2021 Australasian Council of Deans of Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities (DASSH) Awards for Leadership in Excellence and Innovation – International Award.

Prof Lupton’s innovative project ‘Doing fieldwork in a pandemic’ was recognised for “providing a wonderful set of resources for scholars around the world [and] has shone a light on the creativity and capacity of HASS (Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences) researchers in Australia and New Zealand” (DASSH 2021).

“Like many other social researchers around the world, I was faced with how to continue with my projects when we and our research participants were subjected to COVID lockdown restrictions. I jumped onto Google Docs and started up a crowdsourced resource for providing ideas that quickly grew to almost 40 pages long. It was great to see how many researchers globally contributed to or shared the resource, helping projects move forward during this difficult time,” says Prof Lupton.

The annual DASSH Awards celebrate the outstanding work of staff in Australasian humanities, social sciences and arts faculties each year and promote their achievements across the region, with the aim of inspiring new initiatives and sharing best practice approaches.

The recipient of the International Award is selected based on Excellence, as demonstrated by measurable impacts of an initiative led by the nominee which aims to improve the international connections of a HASS faculty, discipline or team, and Innovation, as demonstrated by the creativity and/or novelty of the initiative led by the nominee.

SEE ALSO

Australian Digital Inclusion Index 2021 Launch

Australian Digital Inclusion Index 2021 Launch

Australian Digital Inclusion Index 2021 Launch

Author Loren Dela Cruz
Date 20 September 2021

The ARC Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making and Society at RMIT, the Centre for Social Impact Swinburne, and Telstra are proud to launch the first findings from our refreshed 2021 Australian Digital Inclusion Index.

Join us to find out how Australia is tracking, gain insights for better digital inclusion programs, and take a first look at the new dashboards which put the Index data in your hands.

Friday 15 October 2021
1.30-2.30pm
Online
Register here 

Presenters:

  • Lyndall Stoyles, Telstra Group General Counsel & GE Sustainability, External Affairs & Legal
  • Distinguished Professor Julian Thomas, Director, ARC Centre for Excellence of Automated Decision-Making and Society, RMIT University
  • Distinguished Professor Jo Barraket, Director, Centre for Social Impact, Swinburne University of Technology

For more information visit digitalinclusionindex.org.au

SEE ALSO

Australian supermarkets move to robot warehouses and on-demand labour

Woman online grocery shopping

Australian supermarkets move to robot warehouses and on-demand labour

Author Loren Dela Cruz
Date 16 September 2021

As lockdowns continue across Australia, many households are doing something they may not have considered just 18 months ago: ordering groceries online.

Australia’s supermarket duopoly, Coles and Woolworths, have raced to implement new technology and transform labour arrangements to keep up with the e-grocery boom.
Both are investing in “smart” warehousing and distribution systems with various degrees of automation, as well as making extensive use of app-driven gig workers for grocery picking and delivery via platforms such as Uber and Airtasker.

ADM+S PhD Candidate, Lauren Kelly, is investigating automated decision-making systems in Australia’s supermarket warehouses, and considers what technological change means for workers. Her research suggests a reimagining of the Australian supermarket is currently underway, speeding up the trend towards on-demand and precarious labour.

In a recent article in The Conversation, Lauren discusses shifts in technology and labour relations currently underway in Australia’s supermarket duopoly. To meet surging demand for grocery home delivery during lockdowns, Coles and Woolworths have formalised partnerships with the gig economy to mobilise on-demand workers. Alongside these changes, both supermarkets are closing their existing–and largely unionised–warehouses to make way for “smart” automated facilities.

She discusses these changes in an interview with James Valentine on ABC Radio where she states “There are big changes taking place on two separate fronts. The first is in the warehouse… and the second is the increased reliance on precarious and on-demand labour to carry out the core business of the supermarket.”

Follow Lauren Kelly on Twitter @laurenkatekelly.

SEE ALSO

Prof Karen Yeung Guest-Edits Special Issue on Algorithmic Regulation with Dr Lena Ulbricht

Algorithmic Regulation VI image

Prof Karen Yeung Guest-Edits Special Issue on Algorithmic Regulation with Dr Lena Ulbricht

Author Loren Dela Cruz
Date 9 September 2021

The ARC Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making and Society’s (ADM+S) Partner Investigator Prof Karen Yeung and colleague Dr Lena Ulbricht have guest-edited a Special Issue on Algorithmic Regulation in the journal Regulation & Governance.

The primary aim of this Special Issue is to critically investigate, refine, and build upon the concept of algorithmic regulation, an analytical construct for investigating the role of algorithms as a mode of social coordination and control in concrete contexts of application. The contributions to this volume offer empirical and conceptual insight which, taken together, provide a fruitful vantage point from which to consider the concept as a vehicle for critical scholarly inquiry. While the academic interest in data and algorithms and digital transformations in society has proliferated since 2017, this Issue offers several observations about what is distinctive about the concept and how it can support critical cross-disciplinary investigation and analysis.

Regulation & Governance is a peer-reviewed journal that serves as the leading platform for the study of regulation and governance by political scientists, lawyers, sociologists, historians, criminologists, psychologists, anthropologists, economists and others. Research on regulation and governance, once fragmented across various disciplines and subject areas, has emerged at the cutting edge of paradigmatic change in the social sciences. The journal advances discussions between various disciplines about regulation and governance, promotes the development of new theoretical and empirical understanding, and serves the growing needs of practitioners for a useful academic reference.

Read the Special Issue online.

SEE ALSO

Researchers Explore Innovative Methods for Researching ADM in Health and Medicine

Health workshop 1 zoom meeting screenshot

Researchers Explore Innovative Methods for Researching ADM in Health and Medicine

Author Deborah Lupton & Loren Dela Cruz
Date 9 September 2021

It is often difficult for social researchers to elicit the public’s understanding and practice of emerging digital technologies—even experts disagree on how exactly to define such terms as ‘artificial intelligence’ or ‘automated decision-making (ADM)’.

In an effort to address this, ARC Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making and Society (ADM+S) Chief Investigator and leader of the Health Focus Area Professor Deborah Lupton convened two half-day online workshops in August to explore innovative methods for researching ADM and AI in the domains of health and medicine to help research participants respond to questions and think creatively about these technologies.

The workshops featured presentations from ADM+S Centre researchers as well as guest speakers from the University of Wollongong’s Australian Centre for Health Engagement, Evidence and Values, and RMIT University’s Digital Ethnography Research Centre, Care-full Design Lab and Social and Global Studies Centre.

Workshop 1, held 10 August, began with presentations from researchers in the ADM+S Centre’s Health Focus Area at UNSW Sydney. Prof Jackie Leach Scully spoke on using dialogue groups to explore moral understandings, Prof Deborah Lupton and Dr Ash Watson discussed creative writing prompts and online workshops, and then Dr Watson and Dr Vaughan Wozniak-O’Connor talked about their cultural probes method. The second session of this workshop featured speakers from the University of Wollongong. Dr Yves Saint James Aquino presented on translating normative theory into empirical research practices, followed by Prof Annette Braunack-Mayer on engaging publics using citizens juries, and then Prof Stacy Carter discussed a range of speculative methods for eliciting understandings of AI in health.

Workshop 2, held on 17 August, started with a presentation from Assoc Prof Anthony McCosker, Dr Yong-Bin Kang, Dr Peter Kamstra, Prof Jane Farmer and Prof Kath Albury on using Natural Language Processing to analyse and improve digital mental health services. This talk was followed by Prof Albury presenting her team’s research on building partnerships for online sexual health and education content moderation. In the second session of this workshop, Prof Anna Hickey-Moody discussed her research on young people, faith, mental health and digital cultures. RMIT researchers Dr Jaz Hee-jeong Choi, Kate Geck and Dr Alan Nguyen then discussed their work on digitally translating the body movements of people with disabilities into artworks. Dr Jacinthe Flore from RMIT’s Social and Global Studies Centre closed the workshop with a discussion on her pilot digital technography work exploring how young adults use AI-powered apps.

The recordings of both workshops are available on the ADM+S Centre’s YouTube channel:

SEE ALSO

ADM+S Researchers Receive Discovery Early Career Research Award 2022

People looking at a computer screen

ADM+S Researchers Receive Discovery Early Career Research Award 2022

Author Loren Dela Cruz
Date 17 August 2021

Three researchers from the ARC Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making and Society (ADM+S Centre) are recipients of the Australian Research Council’s Discovery Early Career Researcher Award (DECRA) scheme for 2022.

Associate Investigator Sarah Erfani, based at the Centre’s University of Melbourne node, received a grant of $403,482 for her project on anomaly detection in cyber security. The project, Making Anomaly Detection Interpretable & Actionable in Hostile Environments, aims to identify and interpret anomalies that can disrupt system performance by introducing the concept of actionable anomalies. It will significantly advance the effectiveness of anomaly detection by developing algorithms that distil local and global structures of data to characterise actionable anomalies and explain their outlying aspects. Project outcomes will enhance the security, trustworthiness and fault-tolerance of critical systems, contributing to international efforts in cyber security.

Associate Investigator Timothy Graham from Queensland University of Technology was awarded $452,000 for his project Combating Coordinated Inauthentic Behaviour on Social Media. The project will develop cutting-edge methods and workflows to accurately distinguish genuine activity from coordinated inauthentic behaviour, and to trace and evaluate the adoption of material spread by malicious actors across multiple platforms.

Research Fellow Jathan Sadowski of Monash University received $421,200 in funding for his project Everyday Insurtech: Impacts of Emerging Technology for Insurance. The project will investigate the emerging insurance technology (insurtech) sector and conduct the first major empirical study of insurtech’s implementation and impacts in Australia, with a focus on automotive, health, and property coverage. The project will result in effective and efficient insurance services for Australians by ensuring risks of insurtech are avoided.

ADM+S Centre Director Julian Thomas congratulated the three recipients.

“The Centre is delighted by the success of our early-career colleagues in the exceptionally competitive ARC DECRA scheme. The new DECRA Fellows are working on issues that are central to the future of automated services, from the management of risk to the identification of authentic communication and the security and trustworthiness of critical systems. We are proud of their achievements and privileged to be working alongside them on these path-breaking projects,” said Prof Thomas.

The DECRA scheme provides focused research support for early career researchers and aims to:

  • support excellent basic and applied research by early career researchers
  • support national and international research collaboration
  • enhance the scale and focus of research in Australian Government priority areas
  • advance promising early career researchers and promote enhanced opportunities for diverse career pathways
  • enable research and research training in high quality and supportive environments

ARC Chief Executive Officer, Professor Sue Thomas,  said “The DECRA scheme provides our promising early career researchers the opportunities and resources to advance their research and build diverse career pathways.”

For a full list of funded DECRA projects please visit the ARC website.

SEE ALSO

ARC Future Fellowships awarded to ADM+S researchers

People blurry in motion in yellow tunnel down hallway

ARC Future Fellowships awarded to ADM+S researchers

Author Kathy Nickels
Date 12 August 2021

Researchers from the ARC Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making and Society (ADM+S) have been awarded ARC Future Fellowships with over three million dollars of funding to support research projects that tackle issues of national priority.

ARC Future Fellowships reflects the Australian Government’s commitment to excellence in research by supporting excellent mid-career researchers to undertake high-quality research in areas of national and international benefit.

ADM+S Future Fellowship recipients:

The breadth of issues that these research projects address demonstrates the cross-disciplinary strengths of the ADM+S Centre.

“We’re delighted by the successes of our ADM+S colleagues in the ARC’s 2021 Future Fellowship round”, said Centre Director Julian Thomas.

“The Future Fellowship scheme plays a vital role in supporting Australia’s next generation of research leaders. Our Centre benefits enormously from the extraordinary work these scholars are doing in illuminating both the positive social possibilities and the hazards of our increasingly connected lives.”

Professor Albury’s research will engage young adult users of digital apps and social platforms with sexual health policy-makers and professionals to develop knowledge-translation resources for sexual health professionals. These resources will be designed to better help engage with young adult’s everyday practices of digitally mediated intimacy, in the context of broader understandings of content moderation and regulation, platform governance, data privacy and data security.

Associate Professor Harpur will be seeking ways to increase the employment rate of Australians with a disability. His research aims to drive advances in scholarship on ableism, informed policy reform, and transferable operational processes for the education and employment sectors, to improve the transition of people with disabilities to work.

Professor Suzor aims to find legal, ethical, technical, and commercial opportunities to counter inequality online. His project will use machine learning and custom data collection tools to create new knowledge about how digital platforms—including search engines, social media, peer economy, and news platforms—can help to tackle misogyny, racism, and other forms of structural discrimination.

SEE ALSO

2021 ECR Seed Funding Grants Announced

Two women working together

2021 ECR Seed Funding Grants Announced

Author Sally Storey & Loren Dela Cruz
Date 4 August 2021

The ADM+S Centre’s Research Training Program has announced the recipients for round 1 of the 2021 ECR Seed Funding Grants. The ECR Seed Funding Grants aim to provide support to the Centre’s early career researchers by funding research projects across the Centre’s nodes, programs and focus areas.

“We are excited to support the first seed funding grants for early career researchers who are developing new ideas, projects and collaborations to further our understanding of the social, legal and technical implications automated decision-making at this critical stage of the centre and the field,” says Chief Investigator Heather Horst, co-leader of the research training program.

Out of the 11 project proposals submitted, 6 were awarded based on high impact outcomes, cross collaboration across ADM+S research groups, focus areas and nodes, and project teams).

The awardees of this funding round include:

  • Prioritising women’s safety: Intersections of automation, systems abuse and domestic violence.
    Project Lead: Dr Lyndal Sleep
    As automation increases across all sectors, the potential for automation to be harnessed in systems abuse by domestic violence perpetrators also increases. The proposed project aims to build capacity in the Centre to research the intersections of automation, systems abuse and domestic violence across multiple nodes, programs and research areas. This will be done by establishing a research group of ECRs to work on a series of workshops to produce a literature review of this new area, and draft a co-authored paper with all members of the research group as authors. The paper will be submitted to a high ranked academic journal. The research group involves ECRs from multiple nodes, streams and research focus areas. The funding is for a research assistant to support the literature review.
  • Precarious warehouse work and the automation of logistical mobilities: Understanding Amazon in the Australian context
    Project Lead: Dr Chris O’Neill
    This will be the first academic research project to analyse Amazon’s Australian ‘fulfilment centres’. We will study how automated mobility technologies are being deployed in Amazon’s new warehouses alongside other automated management and worker monitoring tools. Our research will combine interviews with warehouse workers and members of the communities proximate to Amazon’s Australian warehouses, alongside analysis of Amazon’s Australian corporate strategy and technology implementation, and a review of relevant workplace surveillance laws. The project will produce an integrated analysis of the use of automated mobility technologies alongside other automated management techniques, with a view towards developing recommendations for the responsible and ethical development of automated systems and sustainable labour practices, as well as canvassing the possibility of reform in Victoria’s workplace privacy regime.
  • Ethical Data Governance of Sex Tech
    Project Lead: Dr Zahra Stardust
    This project brings together industry, civil society and academia to workshop how innovative sexual technologies can be governed at scale in ways that prioritise public interest benefit and feminist data ethics, in order to reduce the harmful impacts of algorithmic sexual profiling. Comprised of two components – an industry workshop and a community hackathon – the project will operate in partnership between three ADM+S nodes (QUT, Swinburne and RMIT), global software consultancy firm Thoughtworks and the international Sex Tech School, an established private training academy for sextech start-ups and professionals. The workshop will involve facilitated conversations about ethical data governance as part of the Sex Tech School, while the hackathon will build on these insights to investigate how community stakeholders understand inclusive sex technologies for public benefit. With a built-in research component to collect data, we will produce two high impact Q1 journal articles, a community report and two podcast episodes, which will apply theoretical frameworks on data feminism, accountable governance, public interest technology and counter-surveillance to the contemporary sex tech field.
  • Hello Barbie! Voice recognition, cultural values, and privacy-by-design in entertainment voicetech for children
    Project Lead: Dr Jenny Kennedy
    This project examines entertainment products designed for children using voice-recognition software to identify products available on the global marketplace, and examine and compare their privacy controls, terms of service, and embedded cultural values within their design. A series of workshops with potential industry partners and scholars will be held to scope future research questions, directions and collaborations. The aim of the outputs identified in this application are to demonstrate a track record between the project team to support a future grant application.
  • Investigating and Mitigating Biases in Crowdsourced Data for Automated Decision-Making Systems
    Project Lead: Dr Danula Hettiachchi
    It is common practice for automated decision-making systems to use crowdsourced data. However, crowdsourcing data collection tasks require subjective judgement which is susceptible to biases held by crowd workers. Simultaneously, the environments and conditions under which crowd workers labour create additional influences and produce further biases. Whether held by the worker, or enforced by their employer, these biases can significantly impact the data quality with implications for models trained using labelled data. This project aims to conduct two crowdsourcing studies that use quantitative and qualitative methods to understand how crowd worker biases influence hate speech tagging task for automated content moderation. In addition, based on our study outcomes, we plan to develop a bias identification model for crowdsourcing that enable data fairness.
  • Gendered Harms Online: Conceptualising, Identifying, and Addressing Harms to Women on Digital Platforms
    Project Co-Leads: Dr Anjalee de Silva & Dr Rosalie Gillett
    Funding support for a virtual workshop to be held in February 2022 to bring together academic, civil society, and industry participants to discuss how gendered online harms are conceived of, regulated, and responded to by platforms, and to investigate ways that automated interventions might better address or mitigate such harms. Analysis of the data collected through the workshop will lead to the publication of an article in a high impact Q1 socio-legal journal, as well as the development of an online research tool that will summarise and visually represent conceptualisations of gendered online harms and platforms’ responses to them. Both the article and the online tool will inform the broader research projects that each of the leaders and collaborators listed in this application are currently working on. A primary focus of the workshop and its outputs will be to ‘map’ the gaps between scholarly and civil society perceptions of the harms to women of relevant online communicative conduct and platforms’ conceptions and regulation of and responses to such conduct.

The Research Training Program is borne from the Centre’s strategic objective to educate and train researchers skilled in responding to the cross-disciplinary challenges of next-generation automation. The program is designed with continuous, active industry engagement and international knowledge-exchange in mind, helping to deliver on the Centre’s outcomes, impacts and linkages, as well as to prepare the next generation of researchers to make world-leading contributions in an increasingly engaged and trans-disciplinary research environment.

For more information please contact Sally Storey, Research Training Coordinator.

SEE ALSO

Why smart home devices need a feminist reboot

Person using home smart device - about to press on mobile phone screen

Why smart home devices need a feminist reboot

Author Kathy Nickels
Date 4 August 2021

In a recent interview on “Talks at Google”, ADM+S researchers Yolande Strengers and Jenny Kennedy discuss their book “The Smart Wife: Why Siri, Alexa, and Other Smart Home Devices Need a Feminist”.

Speaking with moderator Jan Schneider, Yolande and Jenny point out that the design of gendered devices reinscribes outdated and unfounded stereotypes and the impacts of advanced technology design on gender equity.

They propose a rebooted Smart Wife that would promote a revaluing of femininity in technology design and society.

Watch the interview here

SEE ALSO

How the monetisation of personal metrics is leading to an individualist journalism

Lady with glasses looking at computer screen

How the monetisation of personal metrics is leading to an individualist journalism

Author Kathy Nickels
Date 2 August 2021

In this opinion piece published on The MediumSilvia Montaña-Niño discusses how the use of engagement metrics and incentive models in newsrooms are leading to a profound shift in newsworkers’ professional identities and the way that a journalist works. This article identifies several factors that are driving journalists towards an individualist journalism model and highlights the problems with monetising newsroom metrics in relation to journalism for the interest of the public and positioning journalists as influencers.

Dr Montaña-Niño says that “incentive models that are based on journalists’ abilities to entertain and engage as part of their branding routines entrench what many researchers have described as an ‘identity dilemma’”. She proposes that “journalists have moved from keeping their traditional professional image and understanding these metrics as mere means for assessing their engagement with and personal connection to the audience on social media, and towards using those metrics as a tool in designing an individual commercial strategy”.

Listen to the ADM+S Podcast episode

Read the full article here

SEE ALSO

Citizen science project explores search engine secrets

Two people looking at a laptop screen

Citizen science project explores search engine secrets

Author Kathy Nickels
Date 26 July 2021

Do search engines influence you more than you think? Now is your chance to help researchers find out.

In 2020, Google processed more than 3.5 billion searches a day – and Forbes Magazine reports that most people see search engines as the most trusted source of information. But not all searches produce the same results.

Search engines adjust their recommendations to suit our interests. The big question is how such personalisation can influence our decisions on anything from where to holiday to whether we get a COVID-19 vaccine.

The new Australian Search Experience project aims to find out. It invites Australian Internet users to join the project as citizen scientists, and download a simple browser plugin to their computer. To install the plugin, simply go to https://staging.admscentre.org.au/searchexperience/ and follow the instructions.

The plugin runs regular searches for common search terms, and reports the results back to the research project. Across thousands of participants, these individual data donations produce a comprehensive picture of what search results different Australians encounter. The plugin won’t transmit any private data at any time.

The project is a partnership between researchers from Australian universities within the ARC Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making + Society (ADM+S) and the international research and advocacy organisation AlgorithmWatch.

Chief investigator Professor Axel Bruns, an internationally renowned Internet researcher in the ADM+S Centre and QUT’s Digital Media Research Centre awarded an Australian Laureate Fellowship earlier this month, said the project explores whether search engines have the potential to create ‘filter bubbles’ or to promote misinformation and disinformation.

“There is a lot of speculation about the impact search engines have on the information we encounter. But we really know very little about how they order and display that information,” said Professor Bruns, whose most recent book is Are Filter Bubbles Real?

“Search engine personalisation may be influencing your search results and consequently shaping what you know of the world. This can affect personal decisions as well as collective decisions as a society – from how we spend our money to who we vote for, and to our attitudes on critical issues like the safety of COVID-19 vaccines.

“If you wonder why your search results may differ from those of a friend, colleague or family member, then we’d like you to participate in this project.

“Modern digital news and media platforms use automated decision-making systems intensively, but rarely reveal how their systems work. We need a way to independently assess the recommendations of search engines, which is why we are running this citizen science project.”

Professor Bruns said the Australian Search Experience project would study the personalisation of search results for critical news and information, across key platforms including Google and YouTube, based on the profiles these platforms establish for their different users.

“The project will provide an independent assessment of how search engines shape the flow of information and public discourse for Australians. We will regularly share our findings with the public,” he said.

“To become a citizen scientist contributing to the project, users just need to install the browser plugin on their computer. Detailed instructions are available at https://staging.admscentre.org.au/searchexperience/.

“As part of the process, participants will be asked for some basic demographic details, but nothing that can be used to re-identify individuals. The searches will all happen in the background with minimal disruption to the users, and the plugin does not capture any private data.”

Visit www.admscentre.org.au/searchexperience for more information, and to join the project.

 

Chief Investigators: Mark Andrejevic, Axel Bruns, Jean Burgess, Nic Suzor, Kimberlee Weatherall.

Associate Investigators: Daniel Angus, Timothy Graham, Ariadna Matamoros-Fernández, James Meese, Falk Scholar, and Damiano Spina

References:

Adapted from QUT Media release: Citizen science project explores search engine secrets

SEE ALSO

Research Fellows Rosalie Gillett and Jathan Sadowski Receive ABC Top 5 Fellowships

Rosalie Gillett and Jathan Sadowski
Dr Jathan Sadowski (left) and Dr Rosalie Gillett (right)

Research Fellows Rosalie Gillett and Jathan Sadowski Receive ABC Top 5 Fellowships

Author Loren Dela Cruz & Kathy Nickels
Date 20 July 2021

ADM+S Research Fellows Dr Rosalie Gillett (Queensland University of Technology) and Dr Jathan Sadowski (Monash University) are recipients of the 2021 ABC TOP 5 Media Residency Program (Humanities), a program which enables some of Australia’s brightest minds to share their skills with the nation.

Rosalie and Jathan were two of five Australian researchers selected for the humanities media residency program for 2021 and will undertake a two-week online residency with ABC Radio National to learn the craft of communicating with a wide audience from some of Australia’s best broadcasters, and how to develop content across radio and digital platforms.

Jathan says “The Top 5 residency is such a great opportunity to learn new skills for communicating research and producing stories about technology and society.”

Now in its fourth year, the program is designed to nurture the communication skills and media awareness of our nation’s emerging thinkers — to help them share their knowledge and expertise with audiences seeking credible material and informed debate.

“I’m very eager to learn how to best translate and disseminate complex academic scholarship in ways that are meaningful for public audiences. In doing so, I hope to empower the public with evidence-based research,” says Rosalie.

 

References:

SEE ALSO

Centre Receives $2.16million Investment from Victorian Government

Former RMIT Vice-Chancellor and President Professor Martin Bean CBE

Centre Receives $2.16million Investment from Victorian Government

Author Nicholas Walsh
Date 14 July 2021

The ARC Centre for Automated Decision-Making and Society (ADM+S) has received a $2.16 million grant from the Victorian Government Higher Education Investment Fund (VGHEIF) to enhance and upgrade the Centre’s technology and research infrastructure at it’s administering organisation, RMIT University.

The VGHEIF scheme was developed in response to the significant impact of the coronavirus pandemic on universities and is intended to cover a raft of individual research projects and capital works, all with a unique focus on community-based renewal.

Former RMIT Vice-Chancellor and President Professor Martin Bean CBE said the facilities and activities funded by the government would help RMIT contribute to Victoria’s social and economic response to the global COVID-19 pandemic and create jobs, enterprises and opportunities for the future.

“RMIT has been proudly working together with the Victorian Government to develop new ways of creating skills, offering educational pathways, partnering with industry, and solving shared community problems. Activating this unique precinct and strengthening its connections with other parts of this great city will create long-lasting benefit for the Victorian economy and community. It is a wonderful milestone for the future of a 20-year vision,” said Professor Bean. 

The development of a social innovation precinct, bordered by Lygon, Victoria, Swanston and Queensberry Streets, will be home to research, ideas, skills and new technology.

It is a fitting environment for the ADM+S Centre, a new, cross-disciplinary, national research centre, funded by the Australian Research Council from 2020 to 2026. The Centre is located at RMIT University, with nodes located at eight other Australian universities, and partners around the world.

ADM+S Centre Director Julian Thomas said the Victorian Government’s two-year investment in the research centre is also a win for the wider community as it will lead to enhanced research outcomes related to “responsible, ethical and inclusive automated decision-making systems, for the benefit of all Australians.”

 

References:

SEE ALSO

How sexual consent can help us design better technology

Traffic lights symbolising consent

How sexual consent can help us design better technology

Author Kathy Nickels
Date 9 July 2021

In this opinion piece published by ABC online news, Jathan Sadowski and Yolande Strangers discuss consent in the context of technological interactions. Based on their recently published research, they argue that the “tech industry needs to go beyond consent events that focus on obtaining one-time, “yes” or “no” consent at the start of a technological interaction, such as during product sign-up”.

They propose an alternative model, inspired by sexual consent best practices from the BDSM community — bondage, domination, submission, masochism — which has been at the forefront of not only understanding but implementing consent as an open dialogue, rather than a single decision.

This opinion piece explains how best practices from the BDSM community — soft/hard limits, safewords, traffic lights, and aftercare —can be applied to make consentful tech by rethinking and redesigning human interactions with internet-connected things like smart fridges and voice assistants.

Read the full article here

SEE ALSO

ADM+S researcher awarded Australian Laureate Fellowship

Axel Bruns sitting with computer screens

ADM+S researcher awarded Australian Laureate Fellowship

Source QUT media
Date 7 July 2021

Leader of the ADM+S News and Media Focus Area, Professor Axel Bruns has been awarded an Australian Laureate Fellowship.

Announced today (7 July) by Federal Education Minister Alan Tudge, Professor Axel Bruns from the ARC Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making and QUT’s Digital Media Research Centre will receive $3,518,080 from the Australian Research Council (ARC) for his project Determining the Drivers and Dynamics of Partisanship and Polarisation in Online Public Debate.

Professor Bruns said escalating partisanship and polarisation, particularly via online and social media platforms, presented an urgent challenge for western democracies including Australia and a threat to cybersecurity worldwide.

The five-year Laureate Fellowship project will conduct the first-ever assessment of the extent and dynamics of polarisation in the contemporary online and social media environments of six nations – Australia, the US, the UK, Germany, Denmark, and Switzerland.

“We aim to enable an urgently needed defence of our society and democracy against the challenges of polarisation,” said Professor Bruns, a recognised world leader in media, communication, and journalism studies, with a particular focus on the evolution of online communication practices.

“Polarisation intensifies social conflicts, threatens economic prosperity, undermines public trust, and ultimately destabilises societies. Such instability can be exploited by domestic extremists or foreign influence campaigns to weaken sovereign states.

“Australia has so far been less affected than other leading democracies, but we are not immune to creeping polarisation and subsequent destabilisation. We must understand the threats we face.

“By developing the evidence base for the dynamics of polarisation in news coverage, audience engagement, public discourse, and social networks, we will identify avenues for avoiding and reducing it in Australian society, safeguarding national cohesion.

“Much recent debate still looks for the drivers of polarisation in all the wrong places. Such perspectives see platform algorithms as creating ‘echo chambers’ or ‘filter bubbles’ that lock users into partisan communities with diametrically opposed views and ideologies.

But as I showed in my recent book Are Filter Bubbles Real?, this ignores the fact that even extremely polarised groups follow mainstream debate very closely and in fact exploit the very absence of echo chambers to maximise the reach of their messaging.”

References:

SEE ALSO

$549,000 Grant Awarded for ‘Cardiac AI: deep learning to predict and prevent secondary cardiovascular events’ Project at UNSW

UNSW Sydney campus

$549,000 Grant Awarded for ‘Cardiac AI: deep learning to predict and prevent secondary cardiovascular events’ Project at UNSW

Author Loren Dela Cruz
Date 6 July 2021

ADM+S Chief Investigator Deborah Lupton and her colleagues Blanca Gallego Luxan, Louisa Jorm, Sze-Yuan Ooi, Jennifer Yu, Nigel Lovell, and Juan Quiro were recently awarded with a $549,000 grant for the project ‘Cardiac AI: deep learning to predict and prevent secondary cardiovascular events’.

Administered by the Centre for Big Data Research in Health at UNSW Sydney with partner organisations eHealth NSW and South Eastern Sydney Local Health District, the project will use electronic medical record data and artificial intelligence technologies to develop and implement an algorithm to identify cardiac patients who are at high risk of a further cardiovascular event before they are discharged from hospital. This will enable the targeting of more intensive interventions such as higher potency medications or home monitoring programs to those more likely to benefit. The algorithm and a prototype visualisation dashboard will be developed ready for implementation at South Eastern Sydney Local Health District (SESLHD).

The funding comes from the Australian Government’s 2022-2023 Medical Research Future Fund – Cardiovascular Health Mission, a $220 million research fund aimed at improving heart health and reducing stroke in Australia.

Deborah Lupton says “This exciting new grant will provide wonderful opportunities for the Health Focus Area I lead in the Centre of Excellence to extend its focus into the use of AI in cardiovascular health.”

For more information on the project, contact Deborah Lupton at d.lupton@unsw.edu.au.

SEE ALSO

It’s complicated: Australian media firms were breaking up with Facebook long before the infamous 2021 news blackout

Image of Facebook open on mobile phone

It’s complicated: Australian media firms were breaking up with Facebook long before the infamous 2021 news blackout

Author Kathy Nickels
Date 28 June 2021

In an article published in The Conversation, James Meese (Associate Investigator at ADM+S), Edward Hurcombe (QUT) and Franscesco Bailo (University of Technology, Sydney) share their findings from their recent peer-reviewed research about the impacts of Facebook’s algorithmic distribution on Australian news media.

Based on a data set of 2 million unique posts, from January 1 2014 to December 15 2020, this article clearly demonstrates a decline in Facebook news engagement since 2014-16.

The authors conclude that “news media outlets can no longer rely on Facebook for easy engagement and audience growth. Whether by choice or necessity, they are already courting readers elsewhere.”

Read the full article here

Read the research paper here

Listen to the ADM+S Podcast Facebook ‘Unfriends’ Australian News.

SEE ALSO

The Automated Decision-Making and Society Podcast Series Has Launched

Young woman and man makes a podcast audio recording in a studio.

The Automated Decision-Making and Society Podcast Series Has Launched

Author Kathy Nickels
Date 28 June 2021

A new podcast series from the ARC Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making and Society (ADM+S) features insights from researchers and industry experts on the potential and unseen impacts of automated decision-making on society. The series is available on our website, Spotify, and Apple Podcasts.

Utopian visions of automated decision-making (ADM) promise new levels of personalisation, control and choice in our future lives. Yet, we still know very little about how automated services are really being incorporated, re-invented or resisted as part of everyday lives. Automation has great potential benefits, but it can also create serious new risks to human rights and welfare.

This insightful and thought-provoking series features conversations with researchers and practitioners who are creating the knowledge and strategies necessary for responsible, ethical, and inclusive automated decision-making.

The initial series explores the impacts of automation in news and media. The topics range from search personalisation, the spread of conspiracy theories; to the influence of metrics and algorithms on journalism, and the Facebook news ban.

This podcast series was created to spotlight the unseen social, cultural and institutional issues created by the rapid growth of technologies and automated decision-making systems in our society.

Share this article

Professor Julian Thomas, Director of the ARC Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making and Society says that research across the Centre has the potential to shape policy and practice for governments, industry and non-profit sectors.

“A major priority of the Centre is to enhance public understanding and inform public debate on automated decision-making,” said Professor Thomas.

“This podcast series provides a great way for people to learn more about the current, critical problems we’re confronting in relation to automation and digital services”.

This series features national and international experts from industry and research in the fields of humanities, social and technological sciences. With informative discussions on the rapid expansion of automated decision-making, our experts discuss the issues associated with ADM and what we can do about them.

Listen to the Podcast now on the ADM+S website, Spotify, or Apple Podcasts

We’d like to thank Brooke Myler for her work in developing this series during her internship at the ARC Centre of Excellence for ADM+S.

SEE ALSO

International Experts Speak at Alternative Data Governance and Alternative Data Economies Seminar Series

Alternative Data Governance and Alternative Data Economies Seminar 3 Discussion

International Experts Speak at Alternative Data Governance and Alternative Data Economies Seminar Series

Author Jake Goldenfein
Date 15 June 2021

The ADM+S Centre’s Institutions Research Program based at Melbourne Law School, recently hosted a four-part seminar series on Alternative Data Governance and Alternative Data Economies in collaboration with MLS’s Centre for AI and Digital Ethics and the ANU’s Humanising Machine Intelligence groups. The series brought eight speakers from across the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the UK into dialogue with discussants from ADM+S, CAIDE, HMI and the broader community.

The series began with the diagnosis that, in the digital context, laws governing privacy, data protection, and consumer protection have participated in building system of social relations in which platforms have become massive, market-like control infrastructures that have transformed individuals into ‘users’- a resource to be mined for data and attention. From there, the series explored alternative arrangements for the governance of our digitally mediated lives and economies, including collective approaches to governing data, attention, and platforms, the role of legal professionals in the ‘new economy’, and indigenous data governance for community produced data resources.

The four seminars are available online on the ADM+S Centre’s YouTube Channel:

Seminar 1 with Katharina Pistor and Salomé Viljoen (discussant Jake Goldenfein) reconceptualizing how data works in the digital economy, the ways in which platforms operate as control infrastructures, the types of social relations they instantiate, and the possibility of democratic data governance: Watch Seminar 1 Recording

Seminar 2 with Julie Cohen and Kean Birch (discussant Kimberlee Weatherall) exploring the degree to which platforms are market players, markets themselves, or something else all-together: Watch Seminar 2 Recording

Seminar 3 with Bronwen Morgan and Nathan Schneider (discussant Jeannie Patterson) discussing the role of collectives in new governance arrangements for data and platforms themselves, as well as the professional skills needed to set those new organisational arrangements in action: Watch Seminar 3 Recording

Seminar 4 with Peter-Lucas Jones and Karen Yeung (discussant Jake Goldenfein) outlining how government use of algorithms have taken the political program of ‘new public accountability’ into the new automated domain of ‘new public analytics’, and how indigenous language resources and data are being built and managed by indigenous groups, for instance using the unique data governance prescriptions of the ‘Kaitiakitanga licence’: Watch Seminar 4 Recording

The topics surfaced in these sessions have exposed a broad research agenda for reforming existing data governance arrangements and building new economic structures and institutions.

SEE ALSO

ADM+S video highlights research in news and media focus area

Person scrolling on tablet

ADM+S video highlights research in news and media focus area

Author Kathy Nickels
Date 9 June 2021

The News & Media Focus Area at the ARC Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making + Society (ADM+S) is one of four Focus Areas of the Centre. The News & Media Focus Area investigates the uses and impacts of automated decision-making in news work, social media platforms, and the digital media and communication environment more broadly.

In this video, researchers from the Centre’s News & Media focus area discuss the rapid progression of automated decision-making technologies in news and digital media environments, the impacts on society, and the ADM+S projects that will investigate the influence of automated decision-making on the news and media experiences of real users.

Watch the full video here

The ADM+ has four cross-centre Focus Areas: News and Media, Transport and Mobility, Health, and Social Services. The Focus Areas provide material for many of the empirical investigations within the ADM+S Centre, and they ensure our research is directed towards engagement, translation and outcomes in exemplary and essential sectors.

SEE ALSO

Facebook and Google used to be the future of news. But now media companies need more strings to their bow.

Person on smartphone

Facebook and Google used to be the future of news. But now media companies need more strings to their bow.

Author Kathy Nickels
Date 20 May 2021

Over time news companies have developed a growing dependency on major platforms such as Facebook and Google to distribute their news. In an article published in The Conversation, James Meese and Edward Hurcombe provide historical context to this dependency, describe the compounding effects of the pandemic, and through their research, reveal new ways that media companies are generating revenue and delivering their news.

The article describes a possible shift of media companies from a dependency on generating clicks on social media to securing a more stable revenue stream.

Read the full article.

Listen to the ADM+S Podcast Facebook ‘Unfriends’ Australian News

SEE ALSO

2020 Annual Report Published

Traffic aerial view

2020 Annual Report Published

Author Loren Dela Cruz
Date 8 May 2021

The ARC Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making and Society 2020 Annual Report is now available online.

The report highlights the significant progress made during the establishment and commencement phase of the Centre. Notably this included bringing together nine Australian universities, eight international university partners, and 14 industry partners into an international research, industry and civil society network, and establishing itself as a leading organisation at the forefront of global research.

Deena Shiff, Chair of the ADM+S International Advisory Board, states “It is a credit to the Centre and its leaders that such a strong collaborative spirit has been woven into the core conceptual framework of the research program. This has been necessary, for as automation evolves, it increasingly requires an understanding of the complex interactions between data, machines, institutions, and people.”

Read the full report.

SEE ALSO

Children’s privacy in lockdown: Intersections between privacy, participation and protection rights in a pandemic

Two children looking at a laptop

Children’s privacy in lockdown: Intersections between privacy, participation and protection rights in a pandemic

Author Kathy Nickels
Date 17 May 2021

Children and young people throughout the world have felt the effects of Coronavirus Disease 2019 and the decisions made in response to the public health crisis, acutely. Questions have been raised about adequately protecting children’s privacy, as schooling, play and socialising went almost exclusively online.

However, due to the historical lack of children’s rights being embedded throughout decision-making processes (including important participation rights), the effects of the increased surveillance as a result of the pandemic have not been thoroughly considered.

In this recent article published in Law, Technology and Humans, authors Lisa Archbold (ADM+S Student Member), Valerie Verdoot, Faith Gordon, and Damian Clifford investigate enabling aspects of privacy for children in relation to education and play, discuss the exploitative risks endemic in not protecting children’s privacy, and suggest some policy responses that will more effectively embed a children’s rights framework beyond ‘parental control’ provisions.

Read the full article.

SEE ALSO

Researchers from ADM+S QUT node share latest projects

ADM+S QUT node meeting

Researchers from ADM+S QUT node share latest projects

Author Jean Burgess
Date 18 May 2021

Researchers from the ADM+S Centre’s node at Queensland University of Technology (QUT) shared updates on work in progress at their second quarterly meeting on Tuesday 11 May 2021, with Centre Director Distinguished Professor Julian Thomas in attendance as part of his visit to Brisbane.

Twenty-four ADM+S QUT staff and students reported their progress, highlights and challenges on a number of significant projects that aim to address critical issues related to content moderation, platform regulation, platform governance, harm and safety in the use of online platforms, search personalisation, platform advertising, and the automation of news.

The ADM+S Centre’s QUT node is based at the University’s Kelvin Grove Campus and is led by Centre Associate Director Professor Jean Burgess.

Learn more about our QUT node.

SEE ALSO

NSW Police want access to Tinder’s sexual assault data. Cybersafety experts explain why it’s a date with disaster.

Person holding phone with Tinder app on screen

NSW Police want access to Tinder’s sexual assault data. Cybersafety experts explain why it’s a date with disaster.

Author Kathy Nickels
Date 29 April 2021

In an article published in The Conversation, ADM+S researchers Rosalie Gillett, Kath Albury and Zahra Stardust discuss the proposed dating app safety initiative between the NSW Police Force and Match Group, the American company behind popular dating platforms including Tinder, Match.com, Meetic, OkCupid, Hinge, PlentyOfFish, Ship, and OurTime.

The authors argue why increased surveillance and automated systems won’t necessarily make dating apps safer to use and conclude that “tech initiatives such as these need to be supported by well-funded and comprehensive sex education, consent and relationship skill-building, and well-resourced crisis services.”

Read the full article here.

SEE ALSO